An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Case legislation is specific to your jurisdiction in which it absolutely was rendered. For instance, a ruling in a California appellate court would not typically be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
If the DIGP finds evidence of a cognizable offense by both party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and move forward according on the legislation. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
If the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a chance to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only done In the event the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence as well as petitioner company responded to the allegations as a result they were well conscious of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
Consequently, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner has to go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If this kind of an appeal hasn't however been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may perhaps then seek further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it needs legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be created and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the regulation, he finds that, whilst it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it's actually rather imprecise about whether the 90-working day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based within the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held for the ninety-day notice requirement, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
The legislation as established in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
Some bodies are provided statutory powers to issue guidance with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, including the Highway Code.
12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons possessing their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is really a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or website guise to try and do away with the candidature in the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative from the law laid down via the Supreme Court during the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. So, the competent authority with the parent department in the petitioner as well as Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount from the petitioner and pay back the pension amount and other ancillary benefits towards the petitioner to which He's entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority on the respondent is usually directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and include all notable cases decided with the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
seventeen . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession of your subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs for being decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this part for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is additionally a perfectly-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.